- Susan Joy, Civil Engineer, City of Fort Collins, Colorado
What we try to do in all of our courses is: share with you what we have learned from 35+ years of R&D into the methods and tactics of Implementation Geniuses.
Even though we do that in all of our various courses, we do it best in this course!
The SDIC management strategy is what’s behind their astonishing ability to get even their opponents to “Grudgingly Go Along” with them. Therefore, the SDIC course is the most important course we teach.
Once you realize that Implementation Geniuses really can implement projects that others cannot, you are bound to ask yourself:
“Is this just another way to manipulate the public? Or to be a spin-doctor?”
They develop an unusual, and often complicated relationship with their opponents… especially with their project’s fiercest opponents that is neither an agreement nor a conventional disagreement.
They, unlike most other public officials, never do Citizen Participation as “an End in Itself,” but only as “a Means to an End. That “end,” or objective, being the Informed Consent of their fiercest opponents.
Working with Implementation Geniuses - primarily officials who have become Implementation Geniuses as a result of our SDIC/CPO training - demonstrates several amazing things:
Democratic decision-making… the idea of participatory “self-governance” is much more difficult than people realize
The people who invented Democracy - the Greeks of 2,500 years ago - failed utterly at making Democracy work, and gave up on it. They concluded that it couldn’t work!
What few attempts have been made at Democracy since have not worked particularly well.
To top it off, the kind of Democracy we are trying in the United States is the most daring—and probably the most brilliantly conceived. However, in many ways, our Democracy is also the most unworkable ever invented.
Thomas Jefferson and his cohorts who came up with the ground rules for this Democracy built it around the rights of the individual... not around the rights of society, or the group, or the majority, as every other society has always done.
The resulting “Jeffersonian” Democracy is designed to give individuals, and other special interests, tremendous clout… including the clout to monkey-wrench, stop, derail, stall, stymie, torpedo, and veto governmental proposals.
No other governmental system ever designed anywhere in the whole history of mankind gives “Over-My-Dead-Body” opponents the kind of negative clout that Jeffersonian Democracy gives them!
That is why public agencies in the US have a much greater need for Consent-Building skills than their counterparts in other countries. In virtually every other country, “the group” prevails over the individual.
Informed Consent is not natural… not with interests who will be hurt by your proposal. And, you will, with virtually every proposal you make, be forced to hurt someone because it’s a fact of life that virtually every solution to a complex problem will hurt some interests.
Opposition, even “Over-My-Dead-Body” opposition, is a far more natural response when your proposal threatens to offend someone’s values than agreement, consensus, or even “grudging” consent… Unless you design Informed Consent… build Informed Consent… engineer Informed Consent… it won’t be there when you come out with your proposal.
One reason their political decision-makers are able and willing to bite the bullet is because of the effect Implementation Geniuses have on the “political climate” surrounding their proposal:
It gives you a big enough perspective where “politics” no longer is a four-letter word, and no longer is synonymous with “irrational” and “frustration.”
From that bigger and better perspective, you discover that your role as a technical expert doesn’t have to be one of near-irrelevance in the political decision-making process.
You will discover that the potential exists for you to have much greater influence over political decision-making than you ever thought… without becoming a political player yourself… and, without manipulating the public or the political decision-makers… but rather by being brutally honest, and nothing less than professionally responsible.
Why it is more difficult, and more important for public officials in the U.S. to develop Informed Consent than it is in any other country
How and why Thomas Jefferson’s idea of trying to create a society where individual values are relatively sovereign has resulted in a government that is:
The role values play in (people’s likes, dislikes, hopes, dreams, fears, aspirations, etc.):
Public officials with responsibility for important, but difficult-to-implement projects, programs, regulations, and missions are the most obvious beneficiaries of this training.
Engineers, scientists, systems analysts, managers, administrators, and other hired professionals in public agencies benefit most because it’s their professional work—and their careers—that are wasted when their recommendations are torpedoed.
However, elected and politically appointed decision-makers can also use SDIC. They suffer many of the same frustrations as do the professionals.
Although the R&D that went into the development of SDIC was carried out primarily in the public-sector, private-sector managers whose proposals are vulnerable to vetoes and political gridlock can also use SDIC to raise their batting average for project implementation.
- the GOOD News: It IS learnable!
In fact, even though it has taken us 35+ years to perfect it, you can learn the basics of it in just a few days! It is very do-able.
Once you start using our Consent-Building Methodology, you become more and more effective. You too will become an “Implementation Genius.”
Experienced administrators who attend this course often tell us that it has been one of the most empowering, enlightening, valuable, useful learning experiences they’ve ever been exposed to.
“Makes more sense than anything else I’ve heard of in all my years of education and life-experiences. If I use even half of what I’ve learned in this course, I will be much more successful in my work as well as with the rest of my life.” -Paula Schmittdiel, Remedial Project Manager, US Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund; Denver, CO
If you’re still not convinced it is worth 3 days of your time, you can get a reference for virtually any public-sector discipline. Just call and we’ll put you in touch with someone in the same or similar discipline who has had and used our training. These folks can explain how it will change your work and life on a daily basis, and how positive and powerful our Consent-Building Methodology truly is.
If you attend and are engaged in all 3 days of one of our training sessions, and can honestly say you didn’t learn anything that applies to preventing, healing, and resolving political gridlock on the projects you are mandated to implement, we will give you a refund of the course tuition.
You see, we make that guarantee because we are willing to bet that if you take a mere 3 days out of your schedule and apply yourself to learn what we have to offer, you will save yourself and your agency years of frustration, wasted funds on lawsuits and unnecessary research, and a life of being ineffective!
Systematic Development of Informed Consent (SDIC)
Kansas City, MO: April 17 - 19, 2012
Lakewood, CO: May 22 - 24, 2012
Seattle, WA: October 2 - 4, 2012
Citizen Participation-by-Objectives (CPO)
Lakewood, CO: June 12 - 14, 2012
Leadership Bootcamp
Eventually to be Taught in Sequence of Online Modules
Monthly Brownbag Sessions
What to do When Feedback is Lop-Sided and Not Representative
Why don’t people believe that We AreListening?
How to Reverse the Phenomenon that “the Media Tends to Make Things Worse, not Better”
Why the Silence of Your Supporters is often Deafening
How can we get the Public’s “Consent” when Key-Players are Always Changing?
Why and How You Must Explain Why Some People have to Sacrifice for the Benefit of Others?
Focusing on Your Opponents: How Implementation Geniuses Overcome the Reflex to Avoid Them
How You can have a Rational Dialogue with Overly Emotional People